Initial Thoughts

DSC_0188So, despite my intention to steer clear of the obvious choice (something food related!) for our book report, I chose Danny Meyer’s Setting the Table.  I feel like I’m forever making food analogies, but this one was too good to pass up.  This thriving restaurateur  attributes his success to a strong focus on hospitality.  For Meyer, “what’s most meaningful is creating positive, uplifting outcomes for human experiences and human relationships…[it’s] all about how you make people feel.” He equates hospitality with accessibility- in his case, fine dining with a caring, authentic staff.  The customers feel like they belong there and want to return again and again.  In the library’s case, this may entail a highly personalized user experience created by a staff that  does not confuse the means for the end…it’s not the technology that’s crucial, but rather the final outcome for the patron- how does this patron feel about herself as a result of her visit to the library- empowered?

This brings me to my first thoughts on the Buckland reading,  Redesigning Library Services: A Manifesto.  While reminding us not to confuse ends with means when planning new library services, he also points out that debating what would be “good” or “bad” for the chosen end also requires making a distinction between different types of ‘goodness’ -“How good is it?” vs. “What good does it do?” vs. “How well was it done?”  These are three very different questions.  Assessment is so slippery.  It reminds me of my ongoing quest to come up with good meals for my family.  I find that there are only a few meals that offer true value, for I am a slave to many masters:  health, economy, taste and self-preservation.  I want to make nutritious, tasty and cost-effective meals for my family without killing my own joy or cutting too deep into my time for other things. I suppose the most “valuable” meals are those that check the most boxes.

See, I can’t stop making food analogies.


2 thoughts on “Initial Thoughts

  1. Funny you should ask. @rdlankes posted about that today: Its a very long post, and emotional too because he’s being treated for cancer, but toward the end of the post he discusses how ‘those who serve’ (doctors, teachers, librarians) have a responsibility to get to the heart…”Instead of informing users, we must see our job as helping a person to learn…it is more than [one’s] memory, [one’s] reason you effect. It is [one’s] emotion, [one’s]needs, [one’s] image of self…” He suggests we endeavor to dig deeper than simply answering the question, but instead try to find the real need. I can imagine some librarians find that easier than others. Is that a realistic expectation for a librarian?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s